Prosthodontist Specialist - Best Doctors | Virtual Consultation Available

The main difference between a general dentist and an oral rehabilitation specialist (prosthodontist) lies in the scope of training, the level of skill and the complexity of the treatments performed.

A general dentist is also qualified to perform restorations such as crowns, bridges or dentures, and in isolated, simple cases this solution is certainly sufficient. However, in situations that require extensive intervention or complex engineering planning of the entire chewing system, the unique knowledge of a specialist in the field is needed.

The main differences are reflected in several aspects:

• A long, supervised training path: after completing general dental studies, an oral rehabilitation specialist goes through an additional clinical and theoretical residency lasting about three and a half years at a recognized academic or medical institution. Receiving the title is conditional on passing the rigorous exams of the Scientific Council and receiving an official specialist license from the Ministry of Health.
• A systemic view of the dentition and the jaw joints: a general dentist usually treats the individual tooth or a specific segment. The specialist, by contrast, is an expert in analyzing the occlusion (the bite), balancing the loads applied to the teeth, and maintaining the health of the jaw joints and muscles, to ensure the rehabilitation lasts for years.
• Managing and coordinating complex treatments: in multidisciplinary cases, the oral rehabilitation specialist acts as the lead and coordinates the work with other specialist doctors (such as gum specialists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and orthodontists) and with the dental laboratory.

Losing a tooth is not only an aesthetic problem, but causes a change in the structure of the jaw and in the entire chewing system. Even in the case of a back tooth (molar) that isn't visible, failing to treat it over time can lead to a chain of structural, functional and health changes in the mouth.

The main consequences of not replacing a missing tooth include:

• Shifting and tilting of neighboring teeth: teeth naturally tend to move toward open spaces. Without the support of the missing tooth, the neighboring teeth may tilt or "collapse" toward the gap, and the opposing tooth (in the opposite jaw) may over-erupt (a phenomenon known as "supra-eruption").
• Damage to the bite (occlusion) and the jaw joints: the shifting of teeth causes an unbalanced distribution of loads during chewing. Increased load on individual teeth can lead to accelerated wear, fractures, as well as pain or functional disorders in the jaw joints (TMJ) and facial muscles.
• Jawbone resorption: the tooth root continuously stimulates the jawbone and signals it to keep being maintained. When a tooth is extracted and there is no root or dental implant in its place, the body begins to break down and resorb the bone in that area due to lack of use. Advanced bone resorption can complicate future implants and cause a sunken, older-looking facial appearance.
• Difficulty maintaining hygiene and an increased risk of decay and gum disease: teeth that have tilted out of place create narrow gaps and angles that are hard to reach when brushing and flossing. The buildup of bacteria in these areas increases the risk of new areas of decay and the development of inflamed gum pockets.
• Impaired chewing and speech: missing teeth reduce the efficiency of grinding food, which may also affect digestion. In the case of front teeth, the gap may cause problems in pronouncing certain sounds.

A dental crown is designed to serve as a long-term solution, and most crowns last many years in the mouth. About 95% of all single crowns survive at least five years after placement without needing replacement. Over the longer term, of 15 to 20 years, the survival rate stands at between 50% and 80%, as natural wear, secondary decay at the edges of the restoration or gum disease lead to a gradual decline in its function.

In general, the differences in survival rates between the various types of materials are relatively small, although all-ceramic crowns on back teeth showed the lowest results in the review due to the chewing loads applied in this area. To extend the life of the crown and protect the tooth underneath, it is essential to maintain meticulous oral hygiene, clean thoroughly along the gum line and visit the dental hygienist and dentist regularly.

A night guard does not stop the grinding itself, but it effectively prevents the health damage it causes. Teeth grinding and jaw clenching during sleep (bruxism) are involuntary movements originating in the activity of the central nervous system, and they are usually related to emotional stress, sleep disorders or neurological factors. Since the guard does not cure the brain's urge to grind teeth, it serves as a physical protective barrier between the upper and lower jaw, absorbs the powerful friction forces, and thereby protects the tooth enamel, prevents cracks and fractures and preserves dental restorations and crowns.

In addition to protecting the teeth, a custom-fitted night guard slightly changes the bite of the jaws and spreads the load across the entire dental arch, which helps relax the chewing muscles and reduces headaches, muscle stiffness and pressure in the jaw joints. However, in order to treat the source of the problem and not just its consequences, it is recommended to combine the use of the guard with treatment of the underlying factors, such as stress management, improving sleep habits and a medical evaluation to rule out sleep-related breathing disorders.

The main difference between the two crowns lies in the composition of the materials, the level of aesthetics and their mechanical behavior over time. A porcelain-fused-to-metal crown is based on a metal framework coated with layers of porcelain, and has a proven clinical track record of decades along with a relatively affordable cost, but its notable drawback is the risk of a dark gray line appearing at the gum line in the event of gum recession, and the danger of superficial porcelain fractures. A zirconia crown, by contrast, is made of an advanced, completely metal-free ceramic material that offers exceptional structural strength, high biological compatibility with gum tissue and a natural aesthetic appearance that does not reveal dark margins.

The choice between the two is not clear-cut and is determined according to the location of the tooth, the bite loads and budget considerations. In front areas with high aesthetic demands, or in the back teeth of patients who suffer from heavy teeth grinding, a zirconia crown is usually the preferred choice. On the other hand, porcelain crowns on a metal base may be a worthy and economical alternative for back teeth that aren't visible when smiling, provided that clinical considerations are taken into account, such as a possible allergy to metal alloys, the thickness of tooth material remaining for preparation, and the need for careful polishing of zirconia to prevent wear of the opposing tooth.